You have to struggle for a right
I’ve just been reading Upenyu’s recent interview with Patricia McFadden, and these two parts really stood out for me:
Zimbabwe really needs a constitution, not because it’s going to give the poor rights, but because it’s like a salve, the healing balm after the fractures. It’s a site where people can come together and collectively imagine themselves as one people. To have common identity, we need that so much in Africa.
But constitutions are deceptive because they appear as though they are giving people rights, but there are no instruments that can endow you with a right. You have to struggle for a right as a collective. You have to conceptualise it, you have to imagine it you have to engage with those who control the sites where your rights are located and then you can create the possibility for that right to be not only located in the state and then the state can protect it, but you’ll also have to have access to it.
You can read and listen to the whole interview here
Friday, June 18th 2010 at 9:27 pm
[...] Patricia McFadden might reckon Zimbabwe’s Constitution making process is less about the substance of the document it delivers, and more about its potential as an opportunity to heal the fractures of our past. But it can be neither substantively or symbolically useful if it isn’t treated seriously, and doesn’t get organised and underway. [...]