A country whose politics makes a tradition of tragic deaths through suspicious automobile accidents can only have very little to claim as an “open society.”

Zimbabwe’s roads after independence are littered with deaths of prominent individuals who everyone knows had become a pain in the ass of the oligarchs. These were individuals expressing their version of the truth as opposed to the “official” line peddled by spin doctors and apologists of the political establishment. The dead men’s crusades would be perfectly in order in any country that is not North Korea.

That this continues to happen long after independence where Africa’s liberation struggle was short-circuited and chaos-riddled by ideological wars defined by the U.S.S.R and the U.S.A and went on to claim anyone from Patrice Lumumba to Amílcar Cabral to Thomas Sankara, to Zimbabwe’s own revolution that ate its own children from Josiah Magama Tongogara to Sydney Malunga points to a political tradition that is inimical to the very ideals the “new democrats” purport to espouse.

In Zimbabwe no accident that claims a prominent politician is an accident at all. It is just one of those things we have come to accept.

What is disturbing is that despite this, it still remains the chosen modus operandi of eliminating perceived opponents.

This cannot be belaboured here, yet the impunity is troubling.

Small wonder that many people here await the day not of healing political wounds but a day of retribution where those fingered in these acts of political assassination will have their testicles squeezed in the people’s angry court.

That Zimbabweans have an “insider” tipping prominent individuals that they are targets of assassination only makes this more disturbing because apparently there is very little or nothing these people can do to avoid what is increasingly their inevitable demise.

It’s only recently that one “powerful” Zanu PF don said of Energy Mutodi’s claim that the don wanted Mutodi killed: “If I wanted him (Mutodi) killed do you think he would still be alive?”

As Karl Max once said about the French revolution, “History repeats itself, the first time as a tragedy, then as a farce.” The month of June synonymous with tragedy for Zimbabwe this time has brought in a new dimension shaping the political discourse of Zimbabwe.  The farce, which many would have anticipated, is just another tragedy repeating itself. It is not farce when citizens prepare to run away from their homes and neither it is comedy when you hear threats of war when you decide to choose the leader of your choice. The past five years of has been a bag mixed fortunes with tears and joy. Shop shelves, which were once deserted all of a sudden became flooded with goods though most of them were imports but the nation managed to survive up to now. At least we managed to survive after the signing of the Global Peace Agreement (GPA) in 2008 to witness the unfolding of another tragedy. Well the GPA is now in its closing episode but it remains to be seen who will claim credit for bringing hope to this nation which was on the brick of collapsing. To some this proclamation of an election date is a farce but to those who suffered during the winter chills of June 2008 will tell you it’s a tragedy. If history is going to repeat itself let it not be in the form of another coalition government.

As Zimbabweans remain stunned by President Mugabe’s 31 July poll proclamation, solace apparently can still be found for those with a huge appetite for political intrigue in Baba Jukwa.

I trawled the social media platforms to get a pulse of people’s reactions and Zimbabweans were simply bamboozled. It gets more fascinating noting that even legal opinion on this has been diametrical, raising questions about the interpretation of the law by these learned men and women.

But that’s not a question to ponder considering our very polarized and very poisoned post-2000 body politic where lawyers have been dragged into the hate politics that continue to characterise the country’s political landscape.

On Facebook for example, Baba Jukwa explained that the decision came outside the ambit of Zanu PF’s own politburo, that Communist Russia inspired anachronism, and which is not a surprise considering that Simon Khaya Moyo says his party is not ready for polls even after the “shock” announcement by his own boss.

And thus it is that Zanu PF officials have always been described in pejorative terms, and many believe the party has an unhealthy infestation of hawks.

To mind comes Patrick Chinamasa whom Baba Jukwa reports is the man – alongside Jealousy Mawarire – scripting Zimbabwe’s latest political drama, a man so bellicose in his demeanor many believe he would have been comfortable as Idi Amin’s right hand man.

Idi Amin was a boxer you see and his bad temper is legendary.

Remember Chinamasa’s parliament punch-up with Bennet, or is it Bennet punching-up Chinamasa?

Or Chinamasa allegedly threatening to beat up a British politician?

Or Chinamasa going loco on BBC’s Hard Talk.

According to BJ who has become that fly-on-the-wall in Zanu PF’s innermost sanctum, there is already a grand plan to take over the levers of the state by the so-called securocrats after the elections which these military men are certain Mugabe will win.

But then that’s not breaking news.

Still, there obviously is no comfort in that, the question is: are Zimbabweans going to allow their vote to be raped by men who in a normal democracy would never win a legitimate election?

A gem that I came across from Baba Jukwa on Chinamasa having now become too powerful for his own good: “To those who have seen our news today (13 June) you should have noticed that the Minister of Justice can’t brief diplomats because he is not the Minister of Foreign Affairs. This was Chinamasa firefighting and take the fight himself because he did his things privately with the President.”

Baba Jukwa seems confident that Zimbabweans must restore their belief in the power of their vote, the question is: are his followers who avidly listen in on the reported disintegration of Zanu PF going to take his exhortations to the letter?

Cynics have already said if only the massive following could translate into actual voting not mere appetite for tabloid-like sleaze.

A comment from James, in Harare:

I feel the current exercise to register and inspect names is a project to hoodwink the outside. I also don’t trust ZEC and voters’ rolls that are run by Tobaiwa Mudede’s office becoz he is biased in favour of ZANU PF.

On 13 June, Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe announced that elections were to be held 31 July. On the same day, Zimbabwe’s Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai rejected this announcement as unconstitutional, and stating that he would not accept Zimbabweans being “railroaded” into “another illegitimate election.”

We shared this information with our subscribers, and asked them to share their opinions with us.

About two-thirds of respondents agreed with the Prime Minister, suggesting that the July 31 date was too sudden, and that it did not allow adequate time for the necessary reforms and legal process to be followed. Around a quarter said the President was right, and were eager for Zimbabwe to hold elections and move forward. And around a tenth of respondents were of mixed opinion, wanting to wait for SADC to step in and comment, or more concerned that elections simply be non-violent, free and fair, regardless of when they are held.

As a few examples, messages in support of Tsvangirai’s position included:

• How can he do dat alone .enough tyme is needed reform first
• They want 2 prolong their stay in power to loot more.NO TO 31/07/06 ELECTIONS whats the rush for
• Mugabe shouldn’t declare election date .Zimbabwe new constitution says election is set amoung the principals
• Hazviite Reforms first what’s the rush about?
• Thus grossly unfair to many zimbabwean given the scenario in media and electoral sides which need reforms, PM is right

Messages in favour of a 31 July election included:

• We are sick and tired we want election today
• Elections ar overdue, & we’re ready as voters. The economy is suffering. MT must accept the date & prepare.
• All we need are nuetral observers. Other issues wil b taken care of by whoever wins. The int’l community wil assist. We don’t want to be bogged down in the current situation any longer.
• Lets get over this thing called ‘election’ coz it has been dragged far 2 long! 31 July is indeed gud.
• The court has already made a ruling and the President is simply abiding.

Where possible, we mapped this opinion, colour coded by category (use this link to open the map full screen, then click on a point to view that point’s comment in a pop-up window):

View full screen

Read more comments on this election announcement by downloading the full list here.

Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe stunned the nation yesterday by using the Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Act to gazette amendments to the Electoral Act in the morning. And then he followed this up with a proclamation of election date in the afternoon, gazetting Zimbabwe’s Harmonised Election for 31 July 2013.

President Mugabe justified this action by claiming deference to the Constitutional Court ruling last month that ordered that Zimbabwe’s elections be held on or before 31 July of this year.

Zimbabwe’s Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai immediately issued a statement rejecting Mugabe’s unilateral setting of the election date, calling it unconstitutional.

Indeed, according to Zimbabwe legislation distribution and analysis service Veritas, Mugabe’s actions are problematic (read illegal and invalid) for a number of reasons:

1)      According to section 31H of Zimbabwe’s old constitution which is still in force, the President was required to act in consultation with Cabinet in proclaiming election dates. Given that yesterday’s actions took everyone by surprise, he clearly didn’t do so.

2)      The Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Act, states that regulations made under the act shall not cover things which the Constitution provides will be covered by an Act of Parliament – The new Constitution requires that the new provisions for the Electoral Law be passed by Parliament, and not made by regulation in terms of another Act (like the Presidential Powers Act).

3)      The Electoral Regulations and the election proclamation have now both been gazetted on 13 June. So both have the same publishing date, that is, they were published simultaneously according to how government dates Statutory Instrument (section 20 of the Interpretation Act). If they were published simultaneously, the regulations “cannot be said to have had effect before the election was called. Hence, under section 157(5) of the new constitution, they must be disregarded.”

So, it would appear that the 31 July election proclamation is both unconstitutional and illegal. The trouble, of course, is how to enforce the law in a country whose President so flagrantly disregards it. This just makes things doubly worrying, however. As Marko Phiri pointed out yesterday, “if Mugabe can unilaterally call for polls despite Tsvangirai’s own earlier declaration that he holds the keys to elections, what is to stop him (Mugabe) from declaring himself a winner in the elections, or as he did in 2008 refuse to accept defeat.”