Kubatana.net ~ an online community of Zimbabwean activists

Sexualities (and much more) Under a Magnifying Glass

TOP del.icio.us

In recent discussions with several colleagues, we floated the idea of organizing a conference in Harare on sexualities. I would emphasize the full stop. Not reproductive and sexual health. Not HIV/AIDS, gender, and sexuality. Not violence against women and sexuality. Those are topics worthy of attention as well as a conference. Yet, conversations have had a slightly different focus, more an interest in exploring sexuality itself by examining, for example: How Zimbabweans understand and negotiate their own sexual selves. The rich histories of sexual practices and meanings in Zimbabwe. The ways discourses around sexuality make their way into projects of nation-building. The blending of Western and African ideas and categories in expressions of sexual rights and sexual liberation. Such a conference would continue to open up discussions about sexualities. Additionally, a meeting of the minds might lend insights into the ways sexuality relates to how day-to-day life happens, and is interwoven into economic, political, and social issues informing advocacy and challenges to the status quo.

The play Loupe, by Mandisi Gobodi, which ran during HIFA, is a good example of the ways sexuality can be an entry point to examine the landscapes and dynamics of the environments we live in. Or in this case a loupe, which is a type of magnifying glass. In the play, two brothers are at odds. One brother (Kilem) is a party commissar; he’s a comrade who likes beer, women, and power. Kilem’s younger brother (Sizwe) reveals he’s gay. In part, the play is about family bonds, while portraying a possible reaction to a family member acknowledging same-sex attraction. But the play is much, much more than a play with a “homosexual” theme. To a degree, the fact that Sizwe wants an intimate relationship another man is irrelevant. The overarching message of the play could have worked if Kilem was reacting to Sizwe having any goal he (Kilem) perceived as wrong. The play astutely unpacks, through Kilem and through sexuality, a mindset that seems present in Zimbabwe, and all over the world. It’s a mind-set driven by the desire to hold extreme and forceful power over people, ideas, and behavior. To manipulate facts, diminish individual rights, and selectively control what is acceptable. All the while building a power base to pressure others to conform. It’s a mindset that might be described as masculine, but not necessarily practiced by men only.

Gobodi’s writing is nothing short of amazingly masterful, particularly in capturing the complicated nuances of life in Zimbabwe. The play is extremely well directed and produced. And the acting . . . the performances were so powerful that when I saw the young man who played Kilem wandering around HIFA I was scared of him. Scared of the ways desire for power is exerted. The play will live on beyond HIFA as the British Council is currently working out plans for another run. It’s a must see for anyone interested in the economic, political, and social dynamics of Zimbabwe.

3 comments to “Sexualities (and much more) Under a Magnifying Glass”

  1. Comment by Kundai:

    Susan,

    You’ve touched on an extremely relevant but oft overlooked aspect in the plethora of opinions people have about our situation in Zimbabwe. I think the question of sexualities and its’ impact on issues of political/social obligations/expectations while important in its own right (as you point out), points to the relevance of thinking about issues of public deliberation and public influence as they play out in Zimbabwe. How, for example, would an investigation into Zimbabwean’s perception of themselves as political people, inform an understanding of the general apathy that Zimbabweans have for politics?

    Asking questions like these and others in the same line, one quickly realizes the importance of developing a Zimbabwean perspective on how public influence and sanction are achieved. Unfortunately, this line of question is not a very popular one currently.

    Please keep me informed as you continue thinking about this. As a Zimbabwean rhetorician, I’m always looking for perspectives from like minded people.

    Best.

  2. Comment by Joseph the Pirate:

    Sexuality. On its own. Man, that wil be the day. I rememebr how debate on sexuality was shot down during the 1999 Constitutional Commission plenaries. Zimbabwe needs that.

  3. Comment by Negotiating Sexualities « Speak! Action Alerts from Radical Women of Color:

    [...] 12 05 2008 via Kubatana.net In recent discussions with several colleagues, we floated the idea of organizing a conference in [...]