Issues in Zimbabwe’s Constitution should have equal importance
What are main issues for the new Constitution? Who determines what is petty and trivial at this point in Zimbabwe? Which issue is supposed to take more weight than the other in forming our new Constitution? I have just read a blog from someone saying that homosexual and gender issues are trivial and should not be magnified as they do not have anything to do with the governance of this country.
I am not for homosexuality but I am a Christian who has been instructed to love the next person as I love myself. I do not hate homosexuals, I just do not agree with what they do and what they believe in. But I am a woman, and gender issues involve me whether I like it or not. The blogger continues to say that Constitutional campaigns have magnified these issues. My question is what campaigns are these? If you have a burning issue and you want it put under the microscope I suggest you have your own campaigns just as those people campaigning for gender are having theirs.
I will talk about what affects me here. It is very important that we deal with gender issues once and for all. Why should I keep quiet when I know that if this issue is left behind, my daughter will face the same challenges that I am facing as a woman? This is an opportunity to make a difference and I am going to grab it by the horns.
To educate you a bit my fellow blogger, gender refers to widely held beliefs, expectations, customs and practices within a society that define masculine and feminine attributes, behavior, roles and responsibilities. Now if anyone is going to be of a governing body which is going to be governing a society, don’t you think they need to have their own individual beliefs and expectations in check?
My point is this; good governance is not going to come about when people in governing spaces do not know their social standing, be they male or female. In fact good governance has got to do with gender issues for a government to work. Every person needs to know who they are, what their roles are and what they are entitled to as human beings. So I say viva to anyone who wants to magnify any issue that they feel is important to them and these issues should be dealt with, and included in the Constitution. If people want to lobby for homosexuality and gender issues let them go ahead. Better yet if there are others who want to have anti homosexual and anti gender campaigns they should also go ahead. What better way to exercise our hoped for democracy and freedom to choose who we are and what we want to be?
Wednesday, May 12th 2010 at 9:46 pm
I appreciate the point you make in your article. However, I find there is one point in it that is a bit annoying and lessens its credibility. That is, what exactly do homosexuals “do”? And what do they “believe in” ? Would it be correct for someone to say “I don’t agree with what heterosexuals do, or what they believe in”? Do all heterosexuals “do” and “believe in” the same things?
You might say, “I don’t mind X group of people, I just don’t like what they believe in” if that group was actually defined by having that belief (Christianity, for example). But I’m unaware of any set of beliefs linking the homosexual community. And what do gay people “do”? Have sex with members of their own sex? Is this the unmentionable thing? I think probably the statement is one of those that have a lot of unexamined conventions behind it, and it could do with some thought.